Networks Hide the Decline in Credibility of Climate Change Science
For years the global warming alarmistsâ mantra has been âthe science is settled.â But a recent series of shocking disclosures about climate science has shaken the credibility of that claim.
The first scandal â ClimateGate â came Nov. 20, 2009, after someone leaked thousands of e-mails from a major climate science group:
Since then there has been an avalanche of admissions and disclosures spreading online through Web sites and foreign newspapers. The cumulative effect has impacted the truthworthiness of the climate science movement. Yet the networks havenât even adjusted their news coverage of the global warming issue to reflect the discoveries.
As President Obama readies his push for cap-and-trade at a potential cost of trillions of dollars, the news networks maintained warnings about the âprecariousâ state of the environment. They depicted the Earth as threatened by global warming and only discussed climate science errors in one-sixth of climate change stories.
Broadcasts Silent about Scandal, Then Defend Alarmist Science: It took ABC, CBS and NBC 14 days to even mention the ClimateGate e-mail controversy. When they couldnât get away with it any longer they downplayed its threat to the credibility of the global warming movement. CBSâs Wyatt Andrews defended alarmists against accusations of âfraudâ and âdeceptionâ saying âif thatâs true, itâs a fraud adopted by most of the worldâs leading scientists âŠâ
Networks Bury Climate Science Revelations with Avalanche of Warming Stories: The networks aired more than six times as many global warming alarmism reports than they did stories mentioning any of the problems with climate science research (86 to 13). ABC and NBC both aired stories about Arctic photographers that indicated their pictures were proof of global warming, even though they were not part of any scientific analysis.
Media âDisappointedâ by Lack of Results in
To improve coverage, BMI recommends:
Donât Ignore Problems with Alarmistsâ Data: All three networks avoided reporting on ClimateGate for 13 days; it wasnât until the 14th day that NBC finally broke the silence. If the cover-up and potential manipulation had been done by scientists arguing against the threat of climate change, would the networks have ignored such a scandal?
Report Both Sides of Climate Science Debate, Donât Advocate One Side: Reporters have a professional responsibility to remain objective and avoid inserting their own opinions into stories. Many network reporters have sorely missed that mark when it comes to reporting on global warming and climate change.
Be Skeptical of Scientists and Politicians Pushing Threat of Warming, Not Just âNaysayers:â Journalists should always look for ulterior motives, possible biases and sources of funding on the part of their subjects rather than taking their word for it. A healthy dose of skepticism especially toward the politicians and scientific alarmists would have resulted in much better reporting on climate change.
Find Other Scientific Viewpoints: There are many scientists who are not part of the global warming consensus. The media often unfairly lump them into one group with labels like âskeptic,â âdenierâ and ânaysayer.â This is an injustice given the widely divergent views in the scientific community. Network reporters should reach out to such scientists and hear what they have to say instead of dismissing and disparaging them. They could begin by attending the 4th International Conference on Climate Change in