Times Reporter Suggests Conservatives Are Paid For With Wal-Mart Money
New York Times reporters Michael Barbaro and Stephanie Strom took a shot at Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) with a September 8 article slamming conservative think tanks for receiving money from the Walton family.
Yet an August 2006 review of IRS records shows that Wal-Mart gives nearly 300 times as much money to liberal think tanks as it does to conservative ones. Barbaro himself also reported that labor unions in 2005 gave about the same amount in one year to one liberal think tank.
Barbaro and Strom led the story noting that âtop policy analystsâ at âprominent conservative research groupsâ have penned op-eds, âdefended the company in interviews with reporters, and testified on its behalf before government committees in Washington.â
The article then complained that these experts âhave consistently failed to disclose a tie to the giant discount retailer,â or funding from âthe Walton Family Foundation,â a philanthropy run by Wal-Mart founder Sam Waltonâs heirs (although separate from the corporation itself).
All told, the Times correspondents added, Walton Family Foundation donations to conservative groups that have defended the retailer âtotaled more than $2.5 million over the last six yearsâ â a matter, he insisted, that raises âquestions about what the research groups should disclose to newspaper editors, reporters or government officials.â
Yet buried deeper in his story, Barbaro acknowledged that labor unions, which are critical of non-unionized Wal-Mart, pumped about the same amount of money in 2005 into one liberal think tank: the Economic Policy Institute (EPI).
The study by researcher David Hogberg, now a senior analyst at the National Center for Public Policy Research, found that of the $150 million in donations given by Wal-Mart in 2004, only $2,530 went to politically right-of-center organizations while 289 times as much went to left-of-center think tanks, a total of $732,350.
In an interview with the Business & Media Institute, Hogberg dismissed Barbaroâs article as exhibiting a bias contrary to the facts by suggesting an ideological brotherhood that doesnât exist.
âThe article made Wal-Mart look like itâs in bed with the conservative movement. Wal-Mart seems to play both sides of the fence,â the researcher added, noting that the company gave to liberal-leaning groups like La Raza, the AARP and the Nature Conservancy.
âIâm sure the folks who run Wal-Mart want to run a profit,â Hogberg concluded, suggesting the retail chain is more interested in a favorable business climate by engaging the political left and right, not being ideologically committed to free markets.
A July 13 story â filed for publication the evening of July 12 â by Barbaro broke the news of âchanges in Wal-Martâs theft policyâ as laid out in â30 pages of documents that were provided to The New York Times by WakeUpWalMart.com,â he acknowledged.
Yet the Web site for the anti-Wal-Mart group first mentioned the internal Wal-Mart memo on July 13 in a blog post, suggesting that Barbaro was given the source material as an exclusive to run in the Times before the labor-backed group took the item to the publicâs attention.
The Media Research Centerâs TimesWatch.org also has an analysis of Barbaroâs September 8 story. With $117 million âin grants in 2004 alone,â TimesWatch noted, the $2.5 million given out in the last six years seems ârather puny.â